Pack HuntersMembership Status
Registration Date: Jun 02, 2003Usergroup: Sponsors
Articles Submitted: 0 articles
Total Comments: 2868 (1 per day)
Total Time Online: 50 days, 3 hours and 45 minutes
Last seen: 04/27/12 - 01:35:06
Biographical Information
Location: Chesapeake, VAOccupation: Woodbutcher
Interests: theoretical physics, guitar, singing
Biography: father of two
Contact Information
Guestbook: View or sign guestbook (0)Submission History
Most recent articles:Pack Hunters
The Gift of a Question
The Scientific History of Paradox
The Paradox of Existence
Find all articles submitted by wuliheron
By wuliheron
06/09/03 (Edited 02/27/12)
Humanity has evolved from pack hunters with unique hunting capabilities, but essentially our behavior remains the same. Although many have denied that animals have feelings and any kind of consciousness, the evidence for such things is rather substantial as well as remarkably clear and self-evident among our closest cousins, the chimpanzees. For the purpose of focusing this discussion, I will not go into the details of the direct evidence for animals having some kind of consciousness and emotional life.
Essentially, pack-hunting societies are organized cultures of hate, which often extensively use guilt and threats to regulate the levels of violence according to the demands of the environment at the time. Whether a particular species of pack hunters utilizes more violence or guilt or threats is, in turn, genetically regulated. Hyenas, for example, are particularly vicious with each other as well as their competition while lions are more laid back. In the case of humans, it has recently been demonstrated that approximately one quarter of the population is genetically predisposed towards more violent behavior if the environment reinforces this predisposition.
The strategy of pack hunting societies can be summed up as, "My enemy's enemy is my friend. " Once one enemy is defeated, you turn your attention towards the enemy that helped you defeat them. For example, once done fighting with a rival pack over a kill, hyenas will then turn their attention towards resolving dominance issues within the pack. In the case of human packs, this level of cooperation has been extended to new heights within the animal kingdom. Rather than merely involving cooperation within the pack against competing packs, among humans multiple packs will form temporary coalitions to defeat their common enemies.
The more hierarchal and competitive the pack society, the more vicious and psychopathically guilt free the individuals within the pack will be. The less competitive, the more they rely on guilt to avoid physical confrontation. However, if enough guilt or violence is brought to bear it will result in a significant trend towards the physical adaptation of the pack becoming more vicious. Under the stress of sustained or extreme violence the physiology of the individual members of the pack changes in a process psychologists currently refer to in humans as â??Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.â?
This causes the parts of the brain that regulate impulse control and positive feelings to shrink. If the stress is sustained from early childhood on, or over a protracted period of time, the physiological changes become permanent within the individual. Such sustained stress and violence is counter-productive to the long-term health and reproductive capacity of animals. It reduces the effectiveness of the immune system, causes mating to become a risky venture, and in general requires the animal to constantly be on guard and expending energy. If the entire pack is exposed to such stresses over multiple generations it will by default select for those individuals better adapted genetically to cope with the physiological and psychological demands of the situation.
In the last thirty years contextualist philosophers have for the first time managed to bridge the profound differences between the cognitive and behavioral sciences in ways impossible for the traditional western sciences. This landmark achievement means that the cognitive sciences can now eventually be based on first principles, direct observation, and exacting quantitative analysis, just as the so-called hard sciences are today. In other words linguistics, psychology, sociology, political theory, and other fields concerned with how people interact can be studied with the quantitative rigor of the so-called hard sciences and fully integrated with many of these. The pack-hunting heritage of humanity provides an obvious evolutionary context with which to begin this quest to more fully understand what it means to be human, what the possibilities are, and what the implications are within an extremely rigorous and testable scientific theoretical framework.
Contextualist theories such as this are pantheistic theories which are broader, more complex, and flexible than traditional western scientific theories, and have steadily dominated western sciences over the last century as they continue to prove they describe nature more completely. Pantheistic philosophies incorporating the paradox of existence as a metaphysical foundation allow for a yet again broader context than more mechanistic variations, and these can be used to describe humanity accurately from every cultural perspective rather than less inclusive perspectives. In other words, they could be instrumental towards promoting world Peace and cooperation in a progressive and natural way.
